小胶质细胞增生Microgliosis · 脑 · 神经系统 · NTP ntp-0385

Comment：
This section deals with the cellular responses of prominent reactive cells in the brain: microglia, capillary endothelial cells, and astrocytes. The microglia are early-responding cells and are apparent in and around an injured site within 12–24 hours. Their evolution to recognizable macrophages is apparent within 48 hours. As macrophages, they have increased cytoplasm, and products of lipid degradation can be detected with periodic acid Schiff reagent and by autofluorescence at 365 nm wavelength. Such phagocytic cells are referred to as lipid phagocytes or, more commonly, “gitter cells.” Figure 1 depicts microgliosis adjacent to an inflammatory mononuclear perivascular cuff (arrow). Note the many elongated, irregular nuclei of typical microglial cells. This image depicts the response of brain to injury by the activation of resident microglial cells. These mesodermal cells enter the brain at an early embryological stage of neural development and have macrophage capability. In the inactive state, they are distributed throughout the brain and are difficult to identify because of their nondiscriminate round nuclear character and lack of visible cytoplasm. When they are activated by the presence of brain injury, they become motile and migrate to the site of injury. In the process of migration, nuclei become elongated and irregular in shape and are referred to as “rod cells.” By this nuclear morphology, they are easily detected (as shown in this image), distributed distant from the perivascular monocytic infiltrate. As well as resident microglia, mononuclear cells of blood and bone marrow origin cross the endothelium and migrate to the injured site, where they also take up phagocytic functions like those of resident microglia. This accounts for the presence of some degree of perivascular cuffing by monocytes adjacent to injured brain tissue, as shown in Figure 1 (arrow). The appearance and function of these blood borne monocytes are not known to be different from those of resident microglia. A particularly useful immunohistochemical stain to detect these cells in brain is the Iba-1 (ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1) antibody. Figure 2 shows activated elongated irregular nuclei (arrows) of microglial cells (rod cells). Shown at high magnification, these activated microglial cells are migrating under chemotactic stimuli to a region of neural injury. It is not possible to say whether these cells are resident microglia or those derived from infiltrating monocytic cells carried to the nervous tissue by the blood stream. Depicted in Figure 3 is the Iba-1 immunohistochemical detection of microglia in cerebral cortex. Note the brown-staining cells and extensive radiating, cross, and longitudinal sections of their processes (arrows). Iba-1 is specifically expressed in macrophages and microglia and is upregulated during cellular activation. Figure 4 shows reactive gliosis and capillary hyperplasia (arrow) in a site of former injury. Capillaries are quickly responsive to injury of adjacent tissue, and endothelial nuclear hypertrophy is evident within 24 hours. To the pathologist these capillary changes are often, upon low-magnification scanning of brain tissue, the first indication of damage in a region. The reactive gliosis seen in this image is likely a mixture of infiltrating blood monocytes and resident microglial cells. None have yet differentiated to recognizable macrophages. The lesion is therefore probably less than 48 hours old. Selective study of endothelial responses may be enhanced by the use of immunohistochemistry using laminin and von Willebrand factor. Figure 5 displays a mixed gliotic response to injury of the putamen, consisting of reactive astrocytes, macrophages, microglia, and mononuclear cells. It is apparent that there is a significant increase in nucleated cells in the region. At this magnification, and with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining alone, it is not possible to identify the specific cell types that make up the population. In many studies, it is only relevant to identify the response as being of mixed glial type, which would include astrocytes, microglial cells, and monocytic cells of blood origin and/or macrophages if they have already differentiated to phagocytic cells. In those cases where specific identification of the types of infiltrating cells is necessary, special stains and immunohistochemistry would be required. Normal astrocytes, protoplasmic and fibrillary, are diffusely distributed in the nervous system, where they serve, among other functions, to stabilize structure and maintain the neural milieu, neuronal energy processes, and the blood brain barrier. The density of the normal astrocyte population in the brain is increased in the glia limitans just beneath the pia mater, and also around blood vessels.Gemistocytic astrocytosis is an integral part of the progressive response to many forms of neural injury and is helpful in uncovering subtle brain injury, as well as giving an approximation of the chronology of the lesions present. Figure 6 shows at high magnification reactive gemistocytic astrocytosis in a site of healing neural injury stained with H&E. Note the typical eccentric nucleus and prominent eosinophilic cytoplasm of these reactive astrocytes (arrowheads) and the less frequent micro-binucleate form (arrow). In addition, the normal radiating processes become enlarged and extensive. In this example, there is a rare form of binucleation of one of the reactive astrocytes, signaling the presence not only of hypertrophy but also of hyperplasia in the response. The appearance of gemistocytic astrocytes is a useful indicator of the age of a brain lesion since it is seldom well developed on H&E sections until 12–14 days after injury. The use of the immunohistochemical technique for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), which constitutes the astrocytic intermediate filaments, will detect the earliest stages of the response. This commences at approximately 7 days postinjury and makes any site of injury more recognizable even if there is little to see with H&E sections. In this way, GFAP is a very useful, sensitive indicator of subtle brain injury and the associated astrocytic responses. While GFAP immunoreactivity is used extensively in neuropathology to identify and quantify astrocytes, some other cell types such as ependymal cells may also express a low level of this intermediate filament.

Recommendation：
The term “microgliosis” should be used when the preponderance of reactive cells have the typical microglial features mentioned and illustrated above. When the nature of the reactive cells is not clearly apparent, and special techniques to identify the cells are not available, then it is appropriate to use the term Gliosis, NOS (not otherwise specified). Gemistocytic astrocytosis is diagnosed, when present. In focal lesions, the neuroanatomic subsite should be noted. If the lesion is noted in multiple sites, it should be diagnosed as Brain, Microgliosis. In all cases, the lesion should be graded. In the presence of concurrent lesions, lesions with the most severity are typically diagnosed. Other concurrent lesions may be diagnosed separately, if warranted by the severity.